Friday, February 6, 2009

Bill Gates starts new company

Former Microsoft chief executive Bill Gates has started a new company, just three months after he stepped down from his day-to-day role at the computer giant to concentrate on charity work.

According to TechFlash, Gates's new company, bgC3, is headquartered in a high-tech office in Kirkland, Seattle, complete with a Microsoft Surface touchscreen computer that is used as a virtual guestbook.

Public documents describe bgC3 as a "think tank". The new company was originally called Carillon Holdings, and was established in March before changing its name to bgC3 in July.

Sources close to the business told TechFlash that the company was not a new commercial venture, but rather a way of coordinating Gates's business and philanthropic work.

He stepped down from his role at Microsoft in order to devote more time to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a charity he established with his wife to find ways of tackling global issues such as health, education and social inequality.

However, the insider also told TechFlash that bgC3 will oversee Gates's personal pursuit of new developments in the worlds of science and technology.

Federal trademark papers lodged with the authorities state that bgC3 will work on a broad range of topics, including "scientific and technological services", "industrial analysis and research", and "design and development of computer hardware and software".

The company name is thought to stand for either "Bill Gates Catalyst 3", underscoring Gates's ambition to continue innovating even after his semi-retirement, or "Bill Gates Company 3", denoting that this is the third major venture Gates has embarked on, after Microsoft and his philanthropic organisation.

The company's website is live, at www.bgc3.com,

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Raja dan demokrasi — Dato’ Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat

Feb 5 — Menteri Besar dalam sesebuah negeri adalah mewakili rakyat dalam sesebuah negeri untuk disembah kepada Raja. Orang lain, walau PM sekalipun adalah orang luar. Kalau tidak begitu maka akan timbul bermacam-macam krisis dan huru hara.

Ini termasuklah siri-siri jenayah dan pencolekan seperti yang berlaku ke atas Menteri Besar Terengganu, Daud Samad dan beberapa Wakil Rakyat di Negeri Kelantan di tahun 1960an.

Status Institusi Raja akan terjejas di mata rakyat kalau Raja mendengar dan akur menerima nasihat (advice) dari orang lain. Di zaman Tun Dr. Mahathir, Institusi Raja terjejas teruk dan jangan-jangan ia terjejas lagi di kali ini.

Ucapan saya ketika di Parlimen di masa itu antara lain berbunyi: “Orang politik akan menjadi Raja/Presiden di masa hadapan. Puncanya kerana peribadi sebahagian Raja-Raja itu sendiri.”

Sistem Beraja tidak menjadi semakin bertambah. Hendaklah diingati benar-benar bahawa sistem Beraja semakin hari semakin berkurangan. Bertambah tidak. Dunia boleh saksikan sendiri bagaimana Raja Nepal di Katmandu, Sultan Hussein di Singapura, Hamingkubuwono di Indonesia, Sultan Kudrat di Filipina, Al-Malik Farouk di Mesir, Shah Iran di Iran, Maharaja China di Negeri China, Maharaja Yaman di Yaman, Iraq, India dan seluruh Benua Eropah. Kini, mereka hanya tinggal sejarah.

Jadi, Institusi Raja di Malaysia perlu berhati-hati benar.

Saya sayangkan Institusi Raja kerana saya tahu bahawa rakyat hormatkan Rajanya. Saya sendiri dapat merasakannya kerana saya sendiri juga daripada keturunan Raja Jembal. Selain daripada menghormati saya dari aspek-aspek yang lain khususnya dari hal agama, mereka hormat saya kerana saya juga datang dari keturunan ini.

Tegasnya semua pihak perlu berhati-hati dalam menangani krisis yang cuba dicetuskan oleh pihak-pihak yang berkepentingan di luar dari Negeri Perak.Ingatlah, Allah Maha Berkuasa diatas segala sesuatu dan Allah tidak akan berpihak kepada pihak yang berbuat kezaliman.

Sebaliknya, Allah akan menurunkan bantuan kepada mereka yang dikhianati dan mereka yang ditindas. Firman Allah S.W.T. bermaksud :

“Maka orang-orang yang zalim itu dimusnahkan sampai ke akar-akarnya. Segala Puji Bagi Allah Tuhan semesta Alam.” (Surah Al An’aam: Ayat 45). — Harakah Daily

Shameful scene unfolding in Perak

THE constitution is the highest law of the land. It is the foundation and source of legal authority, and the Rulers are sworn to protect and uphold it.

According to the constitution, Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin is menteri besar until he resigns of his own accord, or is removed by a vote of no-confidence in a formal sitting of the assembly. The constitution makes no provision for his removal by any other means, including by petitions or instructions from any other authority.

Two principles need clarifying in the light of today's events.

First, the government of the day is established according to rules and principles codified in the constitution. This is the difference between a legitimately-formed government and tyranny, which is rule by the law of the jungle.

Second, a legitimate constitutional government draws all its authority from the consent of the people and only from that consent. The people consent because it is their government formed according to their constitution, whose leaders they have chosen through free and fair elections.

We need to test that consent periodically. At key points such as when governments are to be formed or to be dissolved, the constitution provides for formal, definitive tests to find out how much of the people's "consent", or support, a government really has.

So we conduct elections to test how much support a candidate for leadership has among the people. The question is posed in elections governed by rules and oversight agreed ahead of time. If those elections are not held, or if there is some doubt that they are free and fair, then the question of legitimate leadership is not
determined. It doesn't matter how many people with flaming torches march chanting your name in the middle of the night. You need to prove you have the support of voters in a free and fair election.

Similarly, the constitution provides for a definitive way to test if the chief minister or the prime minister commands a majority in the Dewan or in Parliament, as the case may be. We put the question to a vote of confidence on the floor of the Dewan. Only the answer of the assembly counts. It doesn't matter how many sworn statements, defections, press conferences, and declarations you have, or what forms of advertisement, display, inducement or force you bring to bear on the question.

To formally test the mandate of the current government, whether in Perak, Sabah or the Federal government, the question must either be put to the people through state elections, or to the assemblypersons through a formal vote in the Dewan. These are the only tests that count in our constitutional democracy.

This is what it means to be a parliamentary democracy. To remove and install governments in any other way is to violate the constitution, erode the rule of law, and to run the risk of forming an illegal government.

Legitimate authority can only be established through the democratic means spelt out in our constitution. Rightful authority is an entirely different thing from the brute power that can be bought, sold or seized by force.

The invisible laws make our government, nation and society possible. I won't begin to describe the harm we would do these things if we began to ratify power achieved without regard for the rule of law in this country.

Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah

The Perak tic-tac-toe

Its all but over for the Pakatan Rakyat government in Perak.

In a series of moves akin to the game of Tic-Tac-Toe, Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak has reclaimed the Bota state seat and won support from legislators representing Behrang, Changkat Jering and Jelapang for Barisan Nasional to brazenly offer to form the state government.

The score is tied 28-28 between Pakatan Rakyat and Barisan Nasional with three indepdendents supporting the ruling federal coalition, strengthening the deputy prime minister’s hand as he prepares to succeed Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi this March.

Getting Perak back into the fold will make up for the ruling coalition’s dismal performance in the March 2008 general elections although it will not change anything in the federal Parliament where Barisan Nasional holds a simple majority.

As all eyes turn to Sultan Azlah Shah as he mulls whether to accede to Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin’s request to dissolve the 59-seat assembly for snap polls and deny Barisan Nasional an easy ride to Ipoh, the implications of today’s events will reverberate wider.

First, it can put to stop any idea of Barisan Nasional assemblymen in Negri Sembilan crossing over like Bota’s Datuk Nasharudin Hashim as Seremban has been awash with rumours of defections resulting from in-fighting in Umno.

Second, it will show Najib’s resolve in keeping Barisan Nasional together as seeks to inspire them against a resurgent opposition led by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim while fending off a souring global economy that is already affecting Malaysia.

Third, it reflect’s Najib’s desire to ensure he will not be the Prime Minister that will lose Putrajaya to the opposition and will take all means necessary to keep the government firmly in Umno’s grip.

Anwar, who 10 days ago crowed about his success in luring Nasharudin, put it bluntly today when he said, “BN is trying to form the state government by hook or by crook - more by crook.”

His allies in the Pakatan Rakyat, DAP and Pas, are still the government pending the sultan’s decision but he has been clearly outfoxed by Najib and Barisan Nasional’s latest moves to unseat the pact by defections.

“We are pushing for dissolution of the state assembly and fresh elections in the state. We must go back to the people and get a fresh mandate,” said Anwar, echoing the wide belief that Pakatan Rakyat can easily win the snap polls with a bigger mandate.

Elections are clearly not on Najib’s mind as he put it succinctly, “Barisan Nasional now has the majority to form the next government. We will seek an audience with the Perak sultan”.

The next few days will see more Tic-Tac-Toe moves as both sides try to shore up their positions to govern the Silver State and by extension, offer a glimpse of their potential to rule Malaysia in a two-party system

Monday, February 2, 2009

As recession ravages their assets, the rich retrench

NEW YORK, Feb 3 — The rich may not be quite so different than you and me these days: They, too, have less money. Their fortunes have fallen along with the prices of stocks, oil and real estate.

Luxury condos on Florida beaches languish; champagne sales are down; private jets sit idle.

Times may be tough for the wealthy, but they're tougher for those who serve and sell to them.

"Business may be a bit off this year," allows Doug Turner, president of Millionaire's Concierge in Fort Lauderdale, which offers everything from VIP concert tickets to US$13,000 (RM46,800) rides in fighter jets for the wealthy. The rich are cutting non-essential items, and that hurts his business. "Everything I sell, you don't need," he says.

Just what defines "wealthy" is subject to debate. The Securities and Exchange Commission defines a high-net-worth person as someone with US$750,000 or more in investible assets. Under US President Obama's tax plan, people earning US$250,000 or more annually are wealthy enough to get a tax increase — and those people are in the top 2 per cent to 5 per cent of all income levels.

By most accounts, the wealthy have done well. Those in the top 10 per cent of income have seen their income rise 34 per cent after inflation since 1979, according to the Federal Reserve, vs 4 per cent for those in the bottom 10 per cent. Their gains have spawned thousands of businesses whose employees pamper, prop up and please the very rich. Those workers are the builders of the vacation condos, the delivery drivers of champagne, the pilots of private jets.

And while the luxury industry isn't anywhere near as big as the market for everyone else, it's still a significant part of the economy (1.2 million luxury cars sold last year alone) — and one that won't recover until the recession is well over.

High-end pain

Make no mistake: The recession is easier to bear if you have a few million in your wallet.

And people with a great deal of money are still going to spend it. For example, the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Washington offered a four-night package that included two tickets to the Inaugural Parade, two tickets to an Inaugural Ball and Gucci luggage. A well-heeled Obama supporter paid US$12,000 a night for it.

Nevertheless, the wealthy are cutting back. Bentley, the British automaker, says sales are down 32 per cent in North America. And a 1947 Matisse cutout at auction at Christie's in December went without a single bid.

"It's conspicuous non-consumption," says David Wyss, chief economist for Standard & Poor's.

And retailers who cater to the wealthy are slashing prices. In tony department stores such as Bergdorf Goodman during Christmas, shoppers could find handbags marked down 40 per cent or more. Big chains such as Saks Fifth Avenue and Bloomingdale's were chopping prices 50 per cent or more.

"It was unbelievable," says Faith Hope Consolo, chairman of the Prudential Douglas Elliman Real Estate's retail sales and leasing division. "Luxury never had sales before Christmas before."

They had little choice. For retailers, inventory is a wasting asset: No one wants winter clothes on the rack in the spring. But many luxury retailers are finding that shoppers are still cutting back.

One strategy retailers are trying, Consolo says: Rolling out lower-price luxury lines that will appeal to the slightly less affluent, thereby increasing their potential market. High-end designer Roberto Cavalli, for example, has launched a line called Roberto Cavalli at H&M, the hip yet far less luxe outlet than, say, Cavalli's line for Saks, where dresses range from US$2,195 for a silk halter gown to US$575 for a diamond-chain-print tee.

Yet, some luxury items hold up well no matter the economic climate, Consolo says: "Anything that makes them feel good or look good." A client who will no longer buy a US$3,000 bag, for example, might splurge instead on a US$30 lipstick.

Luxury-home builders have been hit even harder than luxe retailers. A survey by the National Association of Home Builders found that sales of homes in the US$250,000 to US$1 million price range declined 80 per cent last year from 2007. Sales of homes priced more than US$1 million fell 70 per cent, says Gopal Ahluwalia, vice-president of research for NAHB.

Low-end suffering

High discounts and low sales have meant financial woes for companies — and that means layoffs.

Neiman Marcus, citing a tough sales climate, said this month that it would cut 375 jobs, or 3 per cent of its workforce. Macy's said it would close 11 stores. Gadget purveyor Sharper Image filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2008. And in Florida, two affiliates of Ginn Cos filed for bankruptcy as two of its high-end housing developments ran into trouble.

Unemployment in luxury retail and the construction industries is soaring. The unemployment rate in the construction industry is 15.3 per cent vs 9.4 per cent in December 2007. For those in the restaurant business, unemployment has shot to 9.8 per cent from 7.8 per cent a year earlier.

Even casinos are feeling the pain. At the Silver Club Hotel & Casino in Sparks, Nevada, 200 workers were laid off in December when banks refused to fund a buyer. The Stations Casinos in Las Vegas said in December that, as a cost-cutting measure, it would stop matching worker 401(k) contributions.

"Layoffs have been significant, and they will be even more significant in the weeks and months ahead," says Bruce Raynor, general president of Unite Here, the union that represents hotel and restaurant workers. "Las Vegas has been hit particularly hard."

Hotel workers in Hawaii and Puerto Rico have been hurt because those areas cater mainly to tourists rather than business travellers, Raynor says.

Then there's the yachting industry. The market for 450-foot ships called gigayachts is relatively unchanged, says Kristen Cavallini-Soothill, director of the American Yacht Institute, a Fort Lauderdale school for stewards and stewardesses. But sales of yachts in the 60- to 110-foot range are suffering, she says. "Even the Russians are slowing down."

Those who are hiring interior crews for yachts are being more discriminating, and those who get jobs are trimming their salary demands, Cavallini-Soothill says. Crewmembers don't demand US$4,000 a month anymore.

"They're going to get paid US$2,500 a month," she says, adding that crewmembers do get free board and meals prepared by a chef.

In Vail, Colorado, the luxury ski resort, lodging occupancy is down over previous years, says Chris Romer, vice-president of sales and marketing for the Vail Valley Partnership. But many of the bookings were made at the last minute, in large part because of special offers: lower prices, extra days, free meals. And, he says, family restaurants are packed at Vail, while average tabs at luxury restaurants have fallen. For the first time, the town of Vail has started its own marketing campaign to lure skiers.

When will the luxury market come back?

It depends, to some extent, on public attitudes towards wealth. At Symbolic Motor Car Co, which sells Bentley, Rolls-Royce, Lamborghini, Lotus and Spyker, business is slow, says general manager Graham Cox. To some extent, that's to be expected in a slow economy. "We're not on the list of everyone's priorities."

But the slowdown may be due, in part, to a recognition that this economic slowdown seems worse than most. After all, the wealthy can still afford fancy cars. But going luxe may be seen as déclassé in an ailing economy, Graham says.

"The wealthy still have the wealth," he says. "It's the image you project in a bad economy of driving a nice car when your friends or colleagues may be losing their businesses." — USA Today

Stocks: Stuck in the Twilight Zone

In a market where hopes for a government-led recovery are countered by fears of worsening earnings and economic data, what could finally free stocks to soar—or tumble further?
It's not as if the market is acting calm or boring. Stocks, and especially particular stocks and sectors, can bounce wildly from day to day. But the bouncing hasn't really gotten equities anywhere. Standard & Poor's equity strategist Alec Young noted Jan. 29 that stocks are "boxed into a near-term trading range." Despite several attempts, the broad S&P 500 index can't seem to dip below 740 to 800, while it can't rise above 940 to 1,045.

A deteriorating economy and terrible corporate earnings have stopped any major rallies in their tracks. But hopes for a new Presidential Administration and for an economic recovery in the second half of 2009 have kept stocks from sinking lower.

Rates at Near Zero
So far, the federal government has provided investors with some downside protection. "Anytime there is a move from Washington, the market moves up," says Quincy Krosby, chief investment strategist at the Hartford (HIG). "Then, the gains quickly evaporate."

The Federal Reserve has slashed interest rates to near zero and the Fed's monetary committee said Jan. 28 it may buy long-term U.S. Treasuries to help heal credit markets. The U.S. Congress continues to weigh a large economic stimulus package, with the House of Representatives approving its $825 billion version of the plan Jan. 28. The Obama Administration, meanwhile, is reportedly studying the idea of a new Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.-managed "bad bank" that would buy up toxic assets from financial institutions.

Demonstrating the hopes many market participants put in the government, PIMCO bond fund manager Bill Gross offered his own prescription in his monthly note on the firm's Web site, published Jan. 29. He said the government needs to find ways to support the prices of assets like municipal bonds or commercial mortgage-backed securities.

The Wisdom of Bill Gross
At a time like this, "the benevolent hand of government is required and Keynes is reincarnated in an attempt to plug the dike via fiscal spending and imaginative monetary policies that support asset prices," Gross writes in his February outlook.

But while government help can spark optimism in the market, those gains can fade quickly. The problem is that many of the government's most important plans are still being developed. The measures that have already been implemented—such as low interest rates or last year's financial bailout—haven't yet stabilized the economy or financial system. "We need to see it happen," says Uri Landesman, head of global growth at ING Investment Management (ING). "It's one thing to debate a bill in Washington and another to see it put in action."

Moreover, many of the measures being debated are unprecedented. No one knows if they will work. "There's no proof in the pudding," says Richard Sparks of Schaeffer's Investment Research. Without knowing if these measures will be successful, investors are stuck merely hoping for a recovery.

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Global Google Breakdown


Google users around the world have been hit by a malfunction that incorrectly reports every other website as potentially harmful.

An apparent system error left millions of visitors to the site puzzled when links to all search results were flagged with the warning 'This site may harm your computer'.

It is thought the site had erroneously identified all other websites - and some of its own pages - as containing malicious software or 'malware'.

The glitch, which prevented internet users from directly clicking through to search results, was fixed within 30 minutes although users of Google's email service Gmail have since reported finding genuine messages sent mistakenly to spam folders.

The errors prompted panic among web surfers who at first feared the popular search engine had suffered some kind of major failure that could have had serious implications for internet commerce.

The Google search page is by far the most popular on the internet, with the overall site receiving several hundred million queries each day. It is the most common homepage and accounts for almost four out of every five internet searches, making it a crucial part of the global economy.

Google automatically identifies sites that may carry viruses and harmful software as part of its searches, but on Saturday all sites that were searched for carried the warning.

It suggests that either every server on the internet had become infected with a virus, an unlikely scenario, or the Google security system had suffered a breakdown.

Users trying to access search results during the outage were forced to cut and past the links into the toolbar and visit the sites manually.

Surfers who tried to find out about the error were unable to access Google's own blog as it has also been incorrectly identified as a harmful link.

A Google spokesman said: "There was a fault. We don't know the nature of it yet. Everything has been solved. We are still making initial enquiries."

Users of the social network tool Twitter who discussed the error reported their internet searches had returned to normal but that problems with Gmail remain. One Twitterer, BradBrownDotCom, joked: "The Google outage frightened me like a schoolgirl, until I remembered an old technology called 'Yahoo'."

Google is so popular worldwide, earning £3bn in income during 2008, that it has been claimed 750 megawatt-hours of electricity could be saved every year if the home page was changed from white to black.

Its headquarters in Mountain View, California, is referred to as the 'Googleplex'