Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Fear And Greed In Stock Market

Fear and Greed are the two driving forces of any market. Greed inflates prices: gets more and more people to jump in the bandwagon and buy the stock, commodity or tulip bulbs and drive prices to a level where they are no longer sustainable and become a bubble.

When greed overcomes the market; no one talks about fear. Greed completely eclipses out fear and the fact that people usually have a short term memory also does quite a bit of good. In times of bull market rallies, people forget what it was like a few months or few years ago and what it meant to be fearful.

During the real estate bubble, investors forgot about the fear and panic that accompanied the dot com bubble. This time it is different - everyone will tell you. The fact that the market collapsed and crashed just a few years ago doesn't help to keep things in perspective and the market heads for one more collapse.

This is just human psychology, and has nothing to do with the country or even century you are in. The first speculative bubble was recoded during the 1600s in what is now Netherlands. It is recorded that prices reached such a high that at one point - 12 acres of land were offered for one variety of a Tulip bulb!

At that time greed was on its high and had completely eclipsed fear. One reason given by historians for the high prices of tulip bulb contracts was that people expected that there will be a parliamentary decree that will void the smaller contracts of tulip bulbs and limit the risk of the buyer.

During the dot com bubble the greed was fed by the assumption that old economic cycles are not applicable to new technologies and the internet will completely change our lives.

Whatever be the reasons: when greed grips the market it overshadows fear completely and makes people forget how scared they were just a few years ago.

Past Greed and Future Greed
Fear works in much the same manner, and, when fear grips the market it eclipses future greed and exaggerates past greed.

People have lost a lot of money in the current financial crisis and they are attributing much of it to the greed of Wall Street Bankers, Hedge Fund Managers, Real Estate Brokers and their like.

Everywhere there are cries about how greedy people at Wall Street have ruined the savings of Main Street. Fear has gripped the market and greed is the culprit.

People are not talking about future greed though, not yet in any case. No one is asking - where the next bubble will form?

Markets are gripped with fear and are blaming past greed, but, that completely eclipses out the fact that there will be future greed.

There are a few seasoned investors who are talking about where the next big move is going to come in - green energy, gold, agriculture, emerging markets etc. but their voice has been crowded out by the cries of fearful investors.

Greed and Fear work beautifully in tandem and complement each other perfectly

Monday, January 12, 2009

Obama optimism seen blunting earnings woes

NEW YORK: Wall Street's enthusiasm for President-elect Barack Obama may come full circle this week as he prepares to take office and help to offset what many expect will be a barrage of bleak corporate earnings reports.

In the week leading up to his Jan 20 inauguration, US stocks will face another trying period beset with more disappointing economic data and the start of the first-quarter earnings season.

But a glimmer of hope for stocks could come from signs that US Congress is heeding his call for an urgent and large stimulus package, after his warning that the economy could slip further into recession and unemployment could climb to double digits.

"We're now turning towards this fiscal stimulus package as potentially our last hope and saviour because there's no indication that monetary policy can any longer break the cycle," said Paul Mendelsohn, chief investment strategist at Windham Financial Services.

Wall Street started 2009 on a sour note, logging its worst week since late November. Global heavyweights Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Intel Corp and Chevron all lowered their earnings estimates, heightening fears of the deepening recession amid expectations earnings will fall.

The focal point was a government report released last Friday that showed the US jobless rate jumped to 7.2%, its highest level in nearly 16 years.

The Dow Jones industrial average ended down 143.28 points, or 1.64%, to 8,599.18. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index slid 19.38 points, or 2.13%, to 890.35. The Nasdaq Composite Index fell 45.42 points, or 2.81%, to 1,571.59.

Friday's unemployment data served as a "stark reminder" of the need to move quickly on the massive economic package, Obama said Friday.

Although there is broad consensus among Democrats and Republicans that bold steps are required to address the economy's struggles, some lawmakers have expressed concerns that the stimulus bill would widen the already soaring US budget deficit.

In coming days, Wall Street will eye the unfolding drama surrounding the stimulus bill, and parse his statements for specific details and figures about his proposed plan, which would combine tax cuts with aid to states and public works projects.

"The kind of details would be what is the split between tax cuts and spending?" said John Praveen, chief investment strategist at Prudential International Investments in Newark, New Jersey. "How soon will it begin to have an impact?"

Those details "are exactly what I think he has to clarify," said Carl Birkelbach, head of Birkelbach Management in Chicago. "He may do that this week and that will help."

Birkelbach said he expected another uptick in stocks this week due in part on rising optimism about Obama's efforts to jumpstart the world's largest economy.

There is precedent for that -- Wall Street enjoyed its biggest Election Day rally ever when Obama won the presidency on Nov 4. And in the week before his election, stocks rallied as well.

Stocks have made strides since scraping their Nov 20 low with the broad S&P 500 index up roughly 20%. Still, year-to-date the Dow is down more than 2%, while the broad S&P 500 is off 1.4% and the Nasdaq is 0.3% lower. These figures point to the fact that highlights the wobbly nature of the US economy.

Another set of preannouncements this week and reams of expected economic data will likely add to anxieties about the market, which is down nearly 43% since its October 2007 record high.

Alcoa and Intel will report earnings this week, but investors will be watching out for fresh earnings revisions, in particular from big banks that will begin posting earnings the week after.

Economic data on tap for this week includes the latest reading of the Producer Price Index on Thursday and the Consumer Price Index on Friday, which investors -- rattled by fears of deflation -- will watch closely.

After major retailers posted disappointing sales last week, the government's report on December retail sales is expected to show a decline of 1.2% during one of the worst holiday shopping seasons in recent memory.

Other key economic indicators are industrial production figures, consumer sentiment data and the Federal Reserve's beige book, a series of anecdotes illustrating the state of the US economy.

"We know the economy is very, very bad and the unemployment numbers are going to be bad," said Praveen.

But if figures are well below expectations, "it creates more uncertainty about how deep the recession is going to be," he said. "It unleashes a whole new set of uncertainties." - Reuters

Friday, January 9, 2009

Obama Seeks Fast Action on Plan

President-elect Barack Obama, warning of "a crisis unlike any we have seen in our lifetime," implored Congress Thursday to move swiftly on a massive economic recovery package.

But the Democrat-led Congress is eager to assert some control and is beginning to chafe at the president-elect's demand for quick approval of a stimulus program pegged at $800 billion and likely to grow.

Mr. Obama's speech at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va., was his first formal address since his election and the official launch of his sales pitch, delivered before an audience of governors, mayors, lawmakers and aides. He warned that an employment report due out Friday will show 2008 to be the worst year since World War II for job losses. Embracing the role and power of government, he said, "Only government can break the vicious cycles that are crippling our economy."

The incoming president conceded that his American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan will "certainly add to the budget deficit" -- projected to be $1.2 trillion for this fiscal year. But, he said, the alternatives to bold and expensive action would be unthinkable. "Equally certain are the consequences of doing too little or nothing at all, for that will lead to an even greater deficit of jobs, income and confidence in our economy," Mr. Obama said.

But even a Democrat-controlled Congress doesn't make the task easy. Rep. James Moran (D., Va.), a member of the House Appropriations Committee, said Mr. Obama's deadline of the scheduled Feb. 13 Presidents Day recess would be "almost impossible to meet."

What is the right balance between tax cuts and spending for the economic stimulus package?Rather than going directly to the House floor, as initially planned, the package will now originate in several congressional committees, including the tax-writing House Ways and Means panel. The House and Senate are likely to approve differing versions of the package, requiring end-game negotiations over a compromise and a second round of votes. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) threatened Thursday to cancel the planned Feb. 13 break to ensure the package is completed.

Meanwhile, Democratic leaders are looking to hand Mr. Obama more-modest early victories. They are accelerating action on expanding the State Children's Health Insurance Program, which President George W. Bush opposed. The House will vote Friday on measures designed to make it easier for women to sue for equal pay with men.

Mr. Obama's team has laid out some components of his plan: a $500-per-worker tax cut; tax write-offs for businesses suffering losses in 2008 and 2009; incentives for business investment; about $100 billion for health care, to temporarily take on more of the states' burden for Medicaid and to finance computerized medical records; billions for old-style building projects targeting roads, bridges, water systems and schools; and billions more to foster alternative energy and energy efficiency.

His speech Thursday established new goals: doubling the production of alternative energy in three years, upgrading the efficiency of more than 75% of federal buildings and two million private homes, and computerizing all medical records in five years. To his wish list, he added requests not usually considered economic stimulus, such as teacher training and scientific and medical research. "Every day we wait or point fingers or drag our feet, more Americans will lose their jobs," he said.

As Mr. Obama ramps up his campaign for his package and floats new details, the opposition is also growing.

Exxon Mobil Corp. Chief Executive Rex Tillerson questioned the president-elect's alternative-energy pledge following a Washington speech Thursday, telling reporters it would be "very challenging" to double renewable energy production as energy demand sinks, credit for new investment dries up and technological advances lag. "Yes, our economy needs help," said House Minority Leader John Boehner (R., Ohio). "But at the end of the day, how -- how much debt are we going to pile on future generations?"

The fight could begin to define how Mr. Obama deals with his former senate colleagues. During much of his eight years in office, Mr. Bush dominated Congress in the battle to set the agenda. Mr. Obama will face demand among lawmakers for a more assertive role. On Thursday, Mr. Obama dispatched National Economic Council Director-designate Lawrence Summers, and senior adviser David Axelrod to the Senate to confer with rank-and-file Democrats. Mr. Summers painted an ominous portrait of the economy, while Mr. Axelrod put the issue in terms of voter fears, according to a meeting participant, Illinois Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin.

In an interview, Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus (D., Mont.) said he called Mr. Summers early Thursday to give him a heads-up that there are "some concerns that need to be addressed."

Mr. Baucus said changes will likely be made to the Obama plan -- he suggested energy-production provisions are likely to be strengthened -- and said there is likely some hard fighting ahead before the measure clears Congress. "Clearly, it's going to be difficult," he said.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Donald's casinos' stock dirt cheap

To understand just how badly the financial meltdown has hurt casino company stocks, look no further than the sale of stock last week by an executive of Trump Entertainment Resorts, the company founded by real estate mogul Donald Trump.

Eric Hausler, the company's senior vice president for development, sold 2,260 shares of company stock, at 18 cents a share.

He got $406.

Even in a recession, that's Trump change.

The company's stock has been battered by crushing debt, a recession that's leaving less money in people's pockets to gamble, and cutthroat competition for gamblers from slots parlors in Pennsylvania and New York.

Moody's Investors Service this week cut Trump Entertainment's probability of default rating, citing the company's decision to delay a scheduled interest payment on some notes.

The company had delayed a $53.1 million bond interest payment that was due Dec. 1, and the 30-day grace period expired. The casino operator had hoped to reach a deal to restructure $1.25 billion in bond debt during that period.

It has since gotten an extension to Jan. 21, but cautions there is no guarantee a deal can be struck.

If it can't, analysts consider a third trip through bankruptcy court likely for Trump Entertainment.

"Every company down there (in Atlantic City) is in deep trouble," Donald Trump told The Associated Press Tuesday. "Show me one that's not."

Revenue for Atlantic City's 11 casinos was down nearly 7 percent for the first 11 months of 2008; year-end figures will be released Friday.

Trump would not say whether he thought the company would be able to avoid a prepackaged bankruptcy filing if talks with bond holders failed to produce a deal.

"I'm not involved in the management of the company," said Trump, who is chairman of the board and its largest single stockholder. Part of the previous bankruptcy reorganization involved Trump relinquishing operational control of the company.

"I'm just an investor," he said.

Mark Juliano, the company's CEO, said he hopes a deal can be struck with bond holders by the Jan. 21 deadline to restructure the company's finances and avoid a bankruptcy filing.

Moody's rating outlook for the company is negative.

"The negative outlook continues to recognize that while Trump remains in discussions with its lenders and certain note holders regarding a possible restructuring of its capital structure, there is no assurance that any agreement with respect to any restructuring will be reached," Moody's said in a statement.

Trump Entertainment has traded as high as $4.80 per share within the past year. It closed at 32 cents a share Tuesday afternoon, down 6 cents from its morning opening.

Juliano said Hausler and other company officials have set up automatic stock sales at predetermined dates to help with tax liabilities, regardless of the current stock price.

To be sure, other casino operators have also seen their share prices plunge.

Pinnacle Entertainment, which has casinos in Louisiana, Missouri and elsewhere, closed Tuesday afternoon at $8.68 a share, down from a 52-week high of $21.48. MGM Mirage closed at $15.96, down from a 52-week high of $75.08, and Penn National Gaming closed at $22.21, down from a 52-week high of $58.99.

Trump Entertainment hopes to complete a deal to sell Trump Marina Hotel Casino to Richard Fields, a former protege of Donald Trump, by spring for $270 million. But the price had to be slashed last fall from $316 million to keep it from falling through.

Besides Trump Marina, the company owns the Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort, and Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino.

Monday, January 5, 2009

Investing Guide During Global Recession

PRICES of diamonds, luxury yachts and even airliners are dipping this recession and even the super-rich may not be spared.

But this shouldn’t come as a shock, really. After so many years of easy money, people have forgotten about the credit cycles that accompany the boom-bust cycles of stock markets and the business cycle.

Various sizes of Kijang Emas, Malaysia’s own gold bullion coins. Gold acts as a reliable store of value as it fulfils the functions of money.

According to Choong Khuat Hock, 47, director of fund management company Kumpulan Sentiasa Cemerlang, credit cycles of tight money go hand-in-hand with recession when bad debts weaken the capital structure of banks and collateral values diminish. This usually follows periods of easy credit and loose lending standards.
“The financial markets will continue to do badly this year,” he predicts.
Since Malaysia is dependent on trade, it is likely to be affected as 30% of exports are commodities, which have more than halved in prices.
Given the dismal scenario, Choong advises people not to rush out to buy assets.

“Gold is a good investment if you want to diversify but it’d be silly to put all your eggs in one basket. Investing in foreign currency is tempting but it’s still highly speculative – given the global recession, people will still run back to US currency.

“There will surely be a decrease in consumer spending and less spent on luxury items. But healthcare and consumer staples will continue to do well.”

The value of antiques does not depreciate.
Going into other types of investments at this time may seem attractive but you need to be sensitised to major trends. For example, the price of Korean antiques rose sky-high as that Tiger economy grew in the 1980s and 1990s, and there was a demand for Stalinist memorabilia when the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was dissolved.

During tough times, people will be less likely to pay for expensive luxuries, so it’s quite possible to pick up some “lifestyle investments” at bargain prices. Generally, it’s recommended that any such investments form only a small part (usually no more than 15%) of a balanced portfolio for investors with fairly substantial net worth.

Midas touch

Like our forefathers before us, when the going gets tough, people may start hoarding gold as it’s a good hedge against inflation as stock markets decline.

However, Choong foresees a deflation this year so gold prices may come down. When everyone is going to be strapped for money in the coming downturn, cold hard cash in hand seems better than investing in gold.

Still, gold is a viable option for those who are looking for somewhere to park their money as its fundamentals are strong.

Based on data by the World Gold Council, gold has remained less volatile against most commodities and precious metals in the current credit crunch.

Pu-er tea was one of the hottest investments in 2007.

According to Maybank’s website on Kijang Emas, Malaysia’s own gold bullion coins, gold acts as a reliable “store of value” because it fulfils the functions of money. It is portable, indestructible and cannot be manufactured. Gold is easily recognisable and accepted as a form of payment.

Its value has remained more or less stable and, as an asset, it has a relatively low-to-negative correlation with other asset classes like currencies, bonds and Treasury bills.

Considered the most liquid of global assets, gold doesn’t depend upon any government’s or company’s promise to repay, nor is it directly affected by economic policies.

Prices have undeniably been affected by the current global market, but JP Morgan has raised its price forecast for gold for 2009 on expectations that investors will buy into bullion as a haven from risk.

Gold investments in Malaysia can be made via the purchase of physical gold bullion in the form of gold coins or by opening a gold savings passbook account which allows account holders to invest without worrying about physical storage.

Account holders can withdraw their gold in cash or physical gold form.

Alternatively, investors can make their gold investments via gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs) listed overseas. The gold shares are backed by physical allocated gold bullion and are traded in US dollars.

Land beneath my feet

Old stalwarts will tell you nothing compares to investing in real estate as stock markets may plunge and other types of assets are not as tangible. And if all else fails, you still have a roof over your head.

In Malaysia, construction and building materials have gone up considerably and, although petrol prices have since been reduced, the same cannot be said of the former.

However, the outlook is still positive as Malaysia is often among the countries on the recommended “buy list” of global property advisers. Our financial institutions are relatively conservative in approving loans and we are not overly dependent on foreign banks.

Teh Lip Kim, managing director of SDB Properties, recommends investing in property.

“From an investment point of view, property has been the way many people have made their money. For those looking to buy homes to live in, this may be a good time to invest,” she says.

“Some property developers have announced that they will be postponing launches to a time when markets have improved. In these trying times, some may be marketing homes with more attractive packages. However, it is unlikely that prices will be very much cheaper, as most developers have to bear the increase in building cost.”

Teh feels this could be a good time to look out for property in the secondary market. Those who purchased property for investment and were not able to continue with their commitment, for example, may be willing to sell for less than the market value.

“For buyers who are thinking of renting out to the expatriate market, location is important. Condominiums in prestigious locations such as KLCC in Kuala Lumpur, for example, would be a good bet. I believe this area is still undervalued compared to similarly prestigious locations in other countries in the region,” says Teh.

For investors who wish to rent out to the local market, landed homes are good buys. They may also consider buying commercial properties such as shop offices in more mature areas.

When considering location, take into account the surrounding area. While certain parts of Kuala Lumpur may be popular, these areas may end up being over-built and congested. Develop-ments which offer more greenery are possible options, as such places are relatively few and far in between.

Ensure that the developer of the project is credible before investing.

The developer must be able to complete the development and carry the project through. This is especially so for condominiums or homes in gated and guarded developments, as maintenance issues will be important in the long run.

For the time being, banks are still lending and coming up with competitive and creative loan packages for potential purchasers. The government has also come up with a stimulus plan which includes measures to boost the property sector, including promoting Malaysian properties overseas.

“If you want to invest in property, it should be of good quality, as such developments will be able to give better returns. Rental yield of anything above 6% can be considered.

“In the current market situation, you’ll have to wait until the market picks up again. My advice is: Be prepared to hold on for at least two to three years before you can get good returns for your property,” says Teh.

Banking on grapes

Some people are turning to alcohol these days, not to drink themselves silly (though given the current economic climate, it would be understandable) but as an investment.

In a newspaper report, Sure Holdings Ltd managing director James Pala said that the biggest appeal of wine as an alternative investment class is that it is low risk, offers stable returns and has a low correlation with stocks and bonds. There is no capital gains tax when the wines are sold.

Liv-ex, the world’s biggest fine wine index based in London, estimates the prices of the best vintages have currently increased by 50% since the start of last year, in sharp contrast to the global stock market, where prices had fallen by 15%.

Bordeaux, a province in France, produces most of the world’s quality and investment-grade wines. From the world’s total production, only 1% is categorised as investment-grade wine, out of which 80% comes from Bordeaux.

The top five performing wine brands of Vintage 2000 are Lafite Rothschild, Haut-Brion, Latour, Mouton Rothschild and Margaux. Investment-grade wines like Lafite survived two major recessions in the past and wine brokers predict it will see through the current one as well.

In Malaysia, the market for investment-grade wines has been on the uptrend this year as investors are looking for safer investments to grow their monies, said Pala in the report. He advised clients to go for less risky and relatively short- to medium-term (two to three years) type of investment.

There are two types of people who spend money on wine: The first only wants to invest money and isn’t interested in product. A serious wine enthusiast will put down money every year for his or her cellar. That’s a classic wine investor or wine buyer, he said.

The second type has a better chance of a return. “Where people fall over is when they invest a lot of money in one vintage,” he says.

London is currently the wine hub of the world and the best place to store your investment as it has the best bonded public wine warehouses equipped with high-tech facilities and conducive storage temperature, among others.

Novices should start small and do research by reading up international wine magazines. Visit online wine sites to find out what’s hot, as it’s crucial to know where and when to buy wines and how to weed out the fakes.

And if it doesn’t work out, at worst you could always drink your investment!

Tea party

Instead of watching the storm brew in a teacup, sit back, relax and have a cup of tea. And while you’re at it, buy a few “cakes” of tea for the future.

One of the hottest investments in 2007 was Pu’er tea from the remote south-western province of Yunnan. Malaysians were speculating tea like nobody’s business and prices fluctuated like the share market, jumping to almost 50% of buying price for certain prized “brands”.

Not unlike fine wine, Pu’er tea improves with age and is believed to have medicinal value, especially those over 50 years old. Investors in southern China and Hong Kong have come to realise that with the limited amount of tea grown each year, prices can be manipulated by storing rather than selling it.

“There are two types of Pu’er: raw and ripe. Raw tea is normally left to ferment and mature naturally and this is the best type for ageing. Different aromas are obtained from different aged teas and, for this, people are willing to pay handsome prices,” explains tea merchant Wayne Thong, 28, from Cheer Ascent.

Ripe Pu’er tea is artificially fermented at the factory stage and has a different taste. Not all teas can be aged; green tea is best consumed when fresh, and teas like Ti Kuan Yin depreciates with time.

“In 2007, the tea market hit a peak as there were too many speculative buyers and now it has bottomed out. This can be a good time to invest but only if you can wait as we’re talking long-term gains – 10 to 20 years’ time.”

Ardent tea collectors maintain that Malaysia’s tropical weather is optimum for ageing tea as it is high in humidity but hot, which means the heat evaporates the moisture faster than fungus can grow.

Collectors should store tea in a dry and cool place, and be patient. Ensure that the storehouse is termite-free. Storage cost is low as an unused room or corner in the house will do.

“Malaysian teas (those from China but aged here) have become a brand in itself and is high in demand,” says Thong, adding that Liu Pao tea can also be considered for investment.

Investors must know how to differentiate between good and poor grade teas to avoid being cheated. New investors should start small and buy newer teas (from five to 10 years) to appreciate the minute differences in aroma, before progressing to older teas.

“It’s a niche market and I wouldn’t promote tea as an investment, if you’re not into tea,” he says.

Aged tea can be sold through a personal network of fellow tea drinkers who collect for personal consumption, or re-sold to the tea shop. You can also scout for buyers on e-bay or tea websites.

“Professional warehouses offer storage facilities and some brokers even promise a return of 20%. But there’s a risk of the broker absconding, since there are no regulations governing tea investment here,” explains tea art director Camellia Siow from Purple Cane Tea House.

In some countries like Hong Kong and Taiwan where Pu’er is highly sought after, buyers employ lo shi (rats) to sniff out where and how the best deals can be obtained.

“These middle men (for a commission) match willing buyers and sellers to get the best tea for the right price. Unfortunately, we haven’t reached that level of expertise in Malaysia,” she adds.

Siow says it was fashionable to invest in tea in 2007 but the bubble has burst as the market is over-committed and experienced investors are putting in more money to even out their cost for long-term profit.

Art attack

What’s art to one person may be junk to another, so how do you begin to collect art? But people are jumping onto the bandwagon anyway due to the meteoric rise of art prices.

That’s because fine art has a very low correlation with stocks and a negative correlation to bonds.

Many predicted a dip in the art market during the 1997 Asian financial crisis, yet quality works maintained or appreciated in value even in those times.

In recent years, more middle-class Malaysians have been buying art and, for the well-heeled, it’s part and parcel of the interior decoration.

In a newspaper report, Valentine Willie, gallery director of Valentine Willie Fine Art, observed that a recession presents buying opportunity as one of its positive side effect is the disappearance of art speculators, whose presence in the Asian secondary market is a blight for our nascent industry. The current situation will benefit real art collectors on the lookout for affordable pieces.

A look at the Moses Annual All Art Index (slate.com/id/2144185/) indicates that not all art performs equally. In recent years, old masters haven’t done so well, while American pre-1950 art soared last year.

Last November, Sotheby’s suffered disappointing sales of impressionist and modern art, prompting speculation that the bubble has burst.

Opportunity for growth in art values arises when investors suddenly focus their attention on a hot new sector or name.

Beyond the blue chip masterpieces such as Picasso and Warhol sold at auction houses like Sotheby’s and Christie’s, there’s a rising demand for Chinese and contemporary Indonesian art today.

For those who cannot afford the stratospheric prices, perhaps it’s best to look to Malaysian or Asian art from neighbouring countries like Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines as the next investment stop.

Newer artists in these countries – like Stefan Duana, Dedy Sufruadi and Yusra Marturnus from Indonesia), and Saiful Razman and Phuan Thai Meng from Malaysia – show potential for growth.

Works by more established artists like Ahmad Zakii Anwar, 53, from Malaysia, the late Pacita Abad from the Philippines and Srihadi Soedarsono, 67, from Indonesia are priced higher but on an upswing; the profits can be attractive.

While art prices are speculative, pricing is an inexact science. A lot depends on demand and supply.

Generally, Malaysian artists are under-valued compared to Indonesian and Filipino artists. For someone who’s starting out, it’s possible to start small, say RM5,000 and invest in an emerging artist. Look out for a new voice, a different perspective or an alternative vision. What’s more important is that the artwork must be something you would hang on your wall!

It pays to read up, visit galleries and exhibitions, and speak to other art collectors before plunging into the art market. Focus on an area or theme. A reputable dealer helps so that you don’t pick up a fake.

Old is gold

Some people may be spring-cleaning their cupboards in the hope of stumbling upon some valuable antique to bail them out of these lean times. But if you’re just starting to collect now, you should be driven by aesthetic rather than investment reasons.

Quality antiques cannot generally be re-sold quickly at a profit but must be held until their value increases sufficiently for a profit to be made. There are also other costs involved such as storage, maintenance and transportation.

But investment in antiques may give substantial rewards in the right circumstances.

Antique dealer Sulega Abdul Rahman of Syarikat Abdul from Malacca says there’s nothing to stop the deep-pocketed from investing in antiques.

“The value of an antique isn’t affected by economic reasons as it doesn’t depreciate. Collectors would have paid a certain sum for their piece and nowadays, if they can’t sell for the expected price, many prefer to wait,” says Sulega, who’s been in the antique business for 25 years.

Obviously, if you’re thinking of unloading your personal collection, this is not a good time. Last March, silver sales at Christie’s and Sotheby’s in Manhattan held its own and reached record high prices, well above expectations.

This year, things may not be so bright. In Malaysia, nyonya pieces are still highly favoured and sought after. Experts suggest that it’s better to specialise in a collection, which will appreciate more, than have a mix of items. This will also limit risks and help you be more adept at spotting growing trends.

Consulting a reputable, well-established and knowledgeable dealer is essential so that you know about quality, market trends and pricing policies. To ascertain the quality of an item, you need to consider its authenticity, condition, rarity, provenance, familiarity, importance and technique.

Buy signed objects and keeping items in their original boxes makes sense as they fetch better prices.

Investing in antiques is a medium- to long-term venture. Like all the other types of investments, the best advice is to be patient

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Flowers, Soros, Michael Dell team to buy IndyMac

WASHINGTON (AP): A seven-member investor group including billionaire George Soros and Dell Inc. founder Michael Dell have agreed to purchase failed lender IndyMac Bank, one of the largest casualties of the housing bust, for $13.9 billion.

IndyMac, which specialized in loans made with little down payment or proof of assets, was seized by the government in July after a run on the bank as the U.S. housing market collapsed. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said Friday that a holding company led by Steven Mnuchin, co-chief executive of private equity firm Dune Capital Management, agreed to buy IndyMac in a deal reached Wednesday.

The investors have formed a partnership, called IMB Management Holdings LP, that includes Dell's investment firm, MSD Capital. Once the deal closes, the investment group will pour $1.3 billion in new capital into IndyMac and continue to operate the Pasadena, California-based bank, the FDIC said.

"We have assembled a group of experienced private investors in financial services to acquire the former IndyMac and operate it under new management with extensive banking experience,'' Mnuchin said in a statement. "We will inject significant private capital into IndyMac so that it can once again effectively serve its customers and communities.''

Investors in the partnership include five private equity firms or hedge funds: J.C. Flowers & Co.; Stone Point Capital; Paulson & Co.; a fund controlled by billionaire George Soros' Fund Management; and a fund controlled by Silar Advisors LP.

Dune Capital was founded in 2004 by former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. partners Mnuchin and Daniel Niedich.

J. Christopher Flowers, who launched, then dropped, a bid to buy student lender Sallie Mae last year, also is a former Goldman Sachs partner. Paulson & Co. made billions in profits in recent years by betting on the failure of risky home loans.

IndyMac has 33 bank branches in Southern California with about $6.5 billion in deposits, about half the company's total at the time of its failure. Other IndyMac assets include a $157.7 billion loan servicing business, which collects mortgages and distributes them to investors, and a reverse-mortgage company, known as Financial Freedom.

The failure of IndyMac, which had $32 billion in assets, was the second-largest last year, trailing only the September failure of Washington Mutual Inc. Under terms of the sale, the new investors will shoulder the first 20 percent of the bank's loan losses, with the FDIC agreeing to take on the majority of any losses thereafter.

The FDIC said Friday its bank insurance fund stands to lose $8.5 billion to $9.4 billion on IndyMac.

The FDIC used a similar loss-sharing agreement when Downey Savings and Loan Association failed in November.

In return, the IndyMac investors agreed to continue a closely watched home-loan modification program launched by FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair in August that has completed about 8,500 loan modifications so far.

The investors have received preliminary clearance from the federal Office of Thrift Supervision to run the bank as a federal savings association. A final decision is expected in the coming weeks.

Thrifts have been the most troubled regulated institutions during the financial crisis and among the most spectacular failures. By law, they must have at least 65 percent of their lending in mortgages and other consumer loans _ making them particularly vulnerable to the housing downturn. Seattle-based thrift Washington Mutual was the biggest bank to collapse in U.S. history, with around $307 billion in assets. It was later acquired by JPMorgan Chase & Co. for $1.9 billion.

FDIC officials noted that private equity firms have bought up failed institutions before. In the early 1990s, two failed banks _ Bank of New England and CrossLand Federal Savings Bank _ were sold to private equity firms. The IndyMac deal comes as regulators have eased restrictions on such purchases.

Previously, private-equity firms could not hold more than a 24.9 percent stake in a bank without becoming a bank-holding company.

A total of 25 U.S. bank failures in 2008 compared with three for all of 2007 and are far more than in the previous five years combined. Many more banks are expected to sink this year.

One unresolved issue is IndyMac's relationship with investors in mortgage-linked securities, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-controlled mortgage finance titans.

Fannie, Freddie and other investors have the right to try to return IndyMac loans if they claim they violate the terms under which they buy mortgages. About $1 billion in loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae are in question.

Fannie Mae "is working constructively with the FDIC and IndyMac to reach a resolution that is in the best interests of all parties involved,'' Fannie spokesman Chuck Greener said Friday.

Thursday, January 1, 2009

BILLIONAIRE BLOWUPS OF 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS

JAN 1 — Dozens of the world's wealthiest lost billions in recent months, but a few distinguish themselves for some of the biggest flops. It was a dreadful year for the world's wealthiest as markets and currencies around the world tumbled.

More than 300 of the 1,125 billionaires we tallied on our annual list last March have since lost at least US$1 billion (RM3.6 billion); several dozen lost more than US$5 billion. The 10 richest from our 2008 rankings dropped some US$150 billion of wealth, dragged down by steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal, estranged brothers Mukesh and Anil Ambani and property baron K.P. Singh, who together dropped US$100 billion. America's 25 biggest billionaire losers of 2008 lost a combined US$167 billion.

But even in such an awful year, the stories of a few billionaires and now former billionaires stand out as particularly dreadful.

Take David Ross, one of Britain’s most successful entrepreneurs. Earlier last month, Ross notified four public companies in which he was a major shareholder and director that he had borrowed against his shares to fund real estate investments that had soured. He will likely have to sell some of those stakes to pay off his debts. So far he has resigned from three of the four boards and stepped down from his post as an Olympics adviser. His fortune, which we estimated at US$1.4 billion in March, is now worth about US$150 million.

Bjorgolfur Gudmundsson, former chairman and a large shareholder in Landsbanki, Iceland's second largest bank, saw the firm seized in October as the worst of the credit crisis tore through the island nation. The failure wiped out his US$1.1 billion fortune. He has since had to put his holding company, Hansa, into voluntary liquidation and is selling his British football team West Ham.

Russians were some of the biggest losers in the past year. Vladimir Lisin's Novolipetsk Iron and Steel is down three-fourths since its June peak. Dmitry Rybolovlev's fertiliser company, Uralkali, has fallen 90 per cent since it peaked around the same time.

But those losses pale compared with the troubles facing Oleg Deripaska. In March he was the world's ninth richest person and Russia's richest man, with a fortune we estimated to be worth US$28 billion. Since then Deripaska has been forced to sell shares in Canadian carmaker Magna International and German construction firm Hotchief, and had to borrow US$4.5 billion from a state-controlled bank to hold on to his stake in Norilsk Nickel. He will likely sell off additional assets to avoid losing even more of his fortune, now estimated at US$10 billion. Or less.

The biggest loser of all was Anil Ambani. Touted on the cover of our 2008 billionaires issue for having added US$24 billion to his fortune in one year, Ambani has dropped US$30 billion since then. But don't worry too much. His Reliance Entertainment is investing US$500 million in a new studio venture with Steven Spielberg's DreamWorks. Plus, he remains quite wealthy, worth US$12 billion That's something many others can't claim.

Billionaire Blowups, 2008

1. Anil Ambani

March net worth: US$42 billion

Current net worth: US$12 billion

The biggest billionaire gainer last March is now the year's biggest loser. Ambani lost US$30 billion in the past nine months, more than anyone in the world. Stock of his telecom company dropped after his estranged brother helped scuttle a deal with African telecom MTN. It's quite an achievement in a year in which three of his fellow countrymen — estranged brother Mukesh, steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal and Indian KP Singh, all of whom ranked earlier among the world's 10 richest — lost more than US$20 billion apiece.

2. Oleg Deripaska

March net worth: US$28 billion

Current net worth: less than US$10 billion

Former metals trader survived Russia's gangster wars but may not withstand collapsing markets and heavy debts of at least US$14 billion. Russia's one-time richest man recently received a US$4.5 billion loan from a state-controlled bank in order to keep his 25 per cent stake in Norilsk Nickel, which faced a margin call by Western banks from which he had borrowed. Other margin calls forced him to divest a US$1.5 billion stake in Canadian carmaker Magna International and a US$500 million stake in German construction company Hotchief. He's also selling stake in insurance company Inogsstrakh.

3. Anurag Dikshit

March net worth: US$1.6 billion

Current net worth: US$1 billion

Dikshit designed the software for PartyGaming's successful PartyPoker game, which allowed live gambling over the web. He left the company and sold a chunk of shares in 2006, the year the US government banned gaming. He recently pleaded guilty to violating US gaming laws and agreed to forfeit US$300 million. He could face up to two years in jail but apparently won't be sentenced until 2010. He has already paid US$100 million of his fine and will pay the rest in two instalments next year.

4. Bjorgflur Gudmundsson

March net worth: US$1.1 billion

Current net worth: zero

The October collapse and government seizure of Iceland's second largest bank wiped out the US$1.1 billion fortune of Gudmundsson, the bank's chairman and biggest shareholder, along with his son Thor. His holding company, Hansa, has since gone into voluntary liquidation and is looking for a buyer for its British football team West Ham. It's not the first time he's run into trouble. A former shipping executive, he was charged with fraud and embezzlement in relation to the firm's 1985 collapse, and was eventually found guilty on five minor counts and sentenced to 12 months' probation.

5. Luis Portillo

March net worth: US$1.2 billion

Current net worth: US$15 million

Spain's short-lived real estate gold rush left one of its most visible speculators holding a nearly empty bag. Portillo — who acquired real estate firm Inmocaral three years ago, then led the takeover of the larger Inmobiliaria Colonial in 2006 — personally borrowed a reported US$1.4 billion from more than a dozen banks during boom times, using his stock as collateral. He resigned as chairman in December 2007 and then tried to sell his stake to a Dubai fund earlier this year. When the deal fell through, he had to sell most of shares to pay debts. — Forbes